Another Integral Explorer

INTEGRAL means comprehensive, inclusive, balanced, not leaving anything out. -Ken Wilber-

My Photo
Name:
Location: Portland, OR, United States

Friday, January 28, 2005

Inclusive, Word, Silence, Understanding

I’ve been re-reading Sharif Abdullah’s book “Creating a World That Works For All”.

His main message is inclusivity. The way in which he presents his philosophy of inclusivity stemming from the root teaching of the ‘golden rule’ in all religions, he seeks to raise the consciousness of individuals and communities, that we are all interconnected and interdependent and we need to reaffirm this basic value that we all possess, loving your neighbor as yourself. Included in this message is the need to affirm a commitment to non-violence in our daily commerce with people, as individuals, as communities, as nations.

What I particularly like about Sharif’s philosophy (which is integral) is not that we all have to homogenize into a single body, but that we are able to recognize, encourage, and respect diversity. The problem is not that we are all different, but that we entertain a mentality of exclusion with those who are different from us. This must give way to the higher consciousness that is taught in every major religion. So the appeal is not to convert to a new way, but to rediscover the old way and apply it fresh to our world. And practice it in every aspect of our lives, not just in religious circles, but to every person with whom we have business. Sharif talks about a Mender consciousness, as an alternative to the Breaker, and Keeper forces of our past. Inclusivity is the essence of spiritual Love.


And as an aside, but related note, I recently have been introduced to Brother DavidSteindl-Rast, a Benedictine monk who is author of “Gratefulness, the Heart of Prayer”.

In an online article at http://www.gratefulness.org/readings/dsr_word.htm Br. David makes the statement, “Our own confrontation with mystery gives us thus, the key for understanding of the relationship between spiritual traditions. Just as silence, understanding, and word imply one another so do the Buddhist, Hindu, and Christian traditions. The Understanding which is the life-breath of Hinduism cannot be separated from Word and Silence which it dynamically unites. The Silence into which Buddhists drop down their thoughts can be separated neither from the Word to which it gives birth nor from the Understanding through which the Word is brought home. Thus a true Buddhist is Hindu and Christian, whether s/he knows it or not. A true Hindu is Christian and Buddhist whether s/he knows it or not. And let us add: a true Christian is Buddhist and Hindu, whether s/he knows it or not. To know it becomes increasingly more timely and important.”


Thursday, January 13, 2005

pondering the gaps

Today I’m pondering the gaps: between “what is”, what “could be”, and what we expect as “should be”.

The concept of “what is” as I am using the phrase is Zen-like awareness, perceptual judgments of how things are connected and working together as a whole. An assessment of the distance between what we see as is and what we see as what could be, this is the gap of possibility. The apprehension of what is and the assessment of the distance between here and what we see as what should be, is the gap of dissonance.

What is arises in our awareness. What could be informs our vision. What we expect should be plagues us with discontent, disgruntlement, maybe even despair.

First we need to sharpen our awareness and assessment of what is, this is constantly up for review and revision moment to moment. Then we envision what could be, maybe triggered by a glimpse or extrapolation of what is, providing vision that motivates us toward a direction. We begin to become disgruntled and uneasy when we begin to grasp our vision as an expectation of what should be. We might resent those who seem to be in the way of closing the gap between what is and what should be. When we start thinking in terms of should, a perceptual shift occurs that blurs our original direction finder, which is the vision of what could be. If we are active in the process of reviewing and revising what we perceive as what is we can then return to the position of possibility and forestall slipping into the mentality of despair.

Sounds like a lot of gibberish right now, but I think it will gel out in time.